CUREG - Post-research self-assessment

Please complete the following fields, as specified in the application validated by CUREG:

1. People taking part in the research

1.1 In carrying out your project, did you encounter any unforeseen situations involving an ethical dimension concerning the people taking part in the research, compared with what was planned in the initial version validated by CUREG?

If yes, which ones?

1.1.1 Were any of the people taking part in the research led to:

- relate personal experiences or intimate behaviour (stressful incidents, sexual behaviour, drug use, etc.) when this was not planned in the initial version validated by CUREG?

- evoke traumas or emotions likely to cause them harm or psychological suffering out of all proportion to what was planned in the initial version validated by the CUREG?

1.1.2 Did the study harm:

- to the psychological integrity of the people taking part in the research, possibly inducing uncomfortable reactions, disproportionate negative sensations or emotions in relation to everyday life, when this was not planned in the initial version validated by CUREG?

- to the social integrity of the people taking part in the research (if experiments are carried out on groups, for example) compared with what was planned in the initial version validated by CUREG? Did participation have any negative social and/or professional effects (e.g. damage to reputation) compared with what was planned in the initial version validated by CUREG?

1.1.3 Did some of the people taking part in the research contribute to the study without their knowledge, i.e. without having previously provided their informed consent, even though the collection of consent was planned in the initial version validated by CUREG?

1.1.4 Did the procedure hide certain information about the research objective or methodology and intentionally transmit certain false information (e.g. experimental induction) when this was not planned in the initial version validated by CUREG?

1.2 Did it appear to you that certain elements were missing from the information letter as provided for in the initial version validated by CUREG?

1.3 Did you encounter any difficulties in implementing the consent procedure compared with what was planned in the initial version validated by CUREG?

1.4 Do you have any other observations about the participants in your study that you would like to share?

1.5 Did the people taking part in the research make any ethically relevant observations in relation to what was planned in the initial version validated by CUREG?

2. Ethical issues and risks

2.1 Have the risk prevention or limitation measures planned in the initial version validated by CUREG been effective?

If not, what are the reasons:

2.2 Did new ethical issues or risks emerge during the course of the research that were not foreseen in the initial version validated by CUREG?

3. Data collected

3.1 In carrying out your project, were there any changes in the way data was collected compared with what was planned in the initial validated version?

If so, which changes have an ethical dimension?

3.2 During the course of your project, were there any changes to data storage compared to what was planned in the initial version validated by CUREG?

If so, which changes have an ethical dimension?

3.3 In carrying out your project, were there any changes in data processing compared to what was planned in the initial version validated by CUREG?

If so, which changes have an ethical dimension?

4.1 Other comments:

Do you have any other comments or remarks to make to CUREG about ethical issues?

By submitting this form,